|
The Truth, the Whole
Truth, and Nothing But the Truth
Arriving
at a trusted source of information for Master Data Management
by Helene Abrams
Download this article (PDF)
Almost everyone has had some experience during which two or more people
have been working on the same task at the same time. In such
cases, it is often hard to determine who has the “master copy” of the
project, and changes made by one individual can easily get lost or
overwritten by changes made by someone else working on the same
thing. If, for example, you and I are both given the same
spreadsheet and told to perform some analysis and report on the
results, it would be very difficult to combine both of our changes and
different calculations after the fact to create a single report, and we
would likely come up with different conclusions. Now imagine
that we are not working with a spreadsheet, but with millions of pieces
of data across an enterprise, and there are not only you and I, but
hundreds of other individuals and systems manipulating the data, all at
the same time. Because situations like this happen every day
within large organizations, it is of utmost importance to establish a
comprehensive trusted source of data in order to maintain systems that
are complete, consistent, and correct.
An organization will have established a trusted source of “master” data
across the enterprise when its information systems provide a single
version of every item of shared data that is consistent with the rest
of the data in the system – and when everyone who needs a data item
knows where to go to find that authoritative version. While
establishing such a trusted source is extremely important, there are
obstacles and challenges that threaten the trusted source in numerous
ways:
- A user may be confronted with conflicting
information from different sources and not offered any help in
interpreting or resolving the differences. Worse, the user
may happen on one version of the data, never suspect that different
(and perhaps truer) versions exist, and make decisions based on
inaccurate information.
- The information obtained by a user is often
incomplete, because the missing information is stored in a system that
is “too many clicks away” from the portal through which the user is
accessing the data.
- There is a lot of redundant data entry.
- Sources sending information into the enterprise
database often have conflicts.
- Attempts to achieve a single trusted source by
multi-directional synchronization of independent databases (containing,
for example, order and return information) present the danger that
timing problems may cause valid data to be overwritten by invalid data.
Even if a database contains a single definitive copy of all the data,
those data are of no use unless the user application’s interface and
other user aids enable people to find the information they need, when
and where they need it. The master database needs accurate,
legible, documented, understandable, and up-to-date models to support
the development of user interfaces and aids that make this data
available to its users.
Finally, once a user has obtained the one true version of some piece of
data, one more thing has to happen to turn the data into valid and
valuable information: The user must accurately understand
what it means. Standardizing procedures and processes across
the enterprise can help an organization to ensure that users understand
the data:
- Standard codings, terminology, and
classifications for crucial shared entities (accounts, projects, etc.)
need to be developed, adopted and put into common use.
- Time-tagging data items can prove useful in
informing users how up-to-date they are.
- Educating new users of an application (and
educating current users of a changing application) on the meaning and
timeliness of the information they will be obtaining through that
application is an essential component of maintaining the integrity of
the database and the enterprise.
Finding
the single source of truth
With the proliferation of silos and channels comes the problem of
knowing whose version of the “truth” is correct: where did it
originate, and how trustworthy is it? The first part of any information
management effort should be to ascertain the owner and original source
of each type of data in an information flow. Only this “single source
of truth” should be accessed for that data by all the other
organizations in the system. It is also important to pay attention to
the management of metadata and master data to improve transparency into
the lineage and quality of data. Organizations need to
consolidate systems that provide data for similar business processes,
identifying and resolving duplicate data and incomplete data, so that
data is entered and updated consistently in one place...the single
source of truth.
|