Breadcrumbs
Home / Case Studies / Align EBS Accounting to Your Current Business / Change Your Chart of Accounts StructureChange Your Chart of Accounts Structure
Your company has outgrown its current Chart of Accounts (COA).
Problem
A utility company has been live on Oracle E-Business Suite for approximately 10 years. They moved to EBS, but the accountants were adamant that the chart of accounts remain the same as the legacy system. They set up four segments: Company (2), Cost Center (2), Account (4), and Future (3). All values were numeric. Cost centers became the catch all for projects, departments, and locations. The company was running out of values for both the cost center segment and the account segment and did not want to reuse values. The company needed to retain all history.
SolutionThe company used FlexField software to:
- Expand their Cost Center segment to 3 digits
- Expand their Account segment to 6 digits
- Add a Project Segment
- Add a Department Segment
- Add a Location Segment
As a result, the company was able to track by departments, locations, and projects. There was plenty of room to put their natural account values in ranges so that reporting and analysis was easier.
Consolidation requires a new COA structure.
Problem
An international financial services company had three instances of their Oracle E-Business Suites. One instance was for the European countries and the UK, another instance was for the US, and the third instance was for the Asia-Pacific region. In all, the three instances had approximately 30 modules of E-Business Suites. There were three different charts of accounts – one for each instance. They realized that the consolidation process would be much easier if the new instance had a common chart of accounts. With a common chart of accounts, all of the transactions from the sub ledgers would be able to be merged without writing translation scripts for each instance. They would also be able to write consistent interfaces to third-party systems from their single new instance. Finally, the performance for their new data warehouse would be significantly improved by not having to perform translation every time data was extracted from their E-Business Suite and loaded into the data warehouse.
Solution
The company designed a new global chart of accounts. They used ranges of values within the natural account segment to accommodate local statutory requirements. They finalized on the mappings from each of the three charts during their first test run. Before they went into production with their new chart of accounts, they used eprentise Consolidation software to merge their instances with the three separate charts of accounts. Then, in their target, consolidated instance, they changed each of the charts of accounts to the new global chart of accounts using FlexField software. They only had to create one set of interfaces to their third-party systems and greatly enhanced the performance on their OBIEE data warehouse.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Doesn’t Oracle E-Business Suite documentation say not to use Oracle database tools to modify Oracle Applications data?
- What happens if something does go wrong and I need to call Oracle Support?
- Why do you suggest consolidation before the upgrade?
- Will Oracle Support continue to provide support for EBS after I use eprentise or FlexField software to improve data quality, reorganize the business structures, split an instance, consolidate instances, or change charts of accounts?
- I’m going to upgrade from 11i to R12 soon. Can I use eprentise or FlexField before the upgrade, and if I do, are there any special considerations?
Solution: FlexField
Solution: Consolidation
Related Blog Posts
- Approaches for Changing the Chart of Accounts: Eliminating the Risks
- Doing the Math: Consulting vs. Software
- If IFRS...Then, Part 2: 5 Best Practices in Designing a Chart of Accounts in Oracle E-Business Suite
- Putting Numbers in Boxes: Spring Cleaning for Charts of Accounts - Part I
- Before You Upgrade to Release 12 - Look at the Data




