Written by Helene Abrams Thursday, July 10 2008
This article discusses the characteristics of a Shared Service Center (SSC), the differences between centralized operations and an SSC, and how R12 facilitates the implementation of a Shared Service Center in E-Business Suite.
Multi-National Corporations (MNCs) with widespread global operations must treat separate (usually location-defined) parts of their businesses differently due to local statutory requirements, taxes, accounting methods, languages, and currencies, yet still must comply with corporate standards. The business must manage issues around security, ownership, reporting, and control for all transactions.
For a MNC operating in 47 different countries spread across 6 continents, daily operations is a tedious exercise that requires that each business unit operates and supports operations independently while sharing data among other parts of the enterprise to leverage sourcing opportunities, inventory, and back-office transactions. Implementing a SSC enables the company to significantly reduce costs by having a central pool of employees to handle day-to-day tasks such as Procurement, Disbursement, Collections, Fixed Assets, Tax Compliance, Training & Development, and Payroll. Instead of carrying out these tasks in each of the 47 different countries and repeating each operation 47 times, a SSC combines similar tasks carried out throughout the enterprise and shares the overhead cost of providing these services internally. Offering these tasks as Shared Services enables the corporation to capitalize on the economies of scale and scope (in the form of reduced headcount, reduced operating costs, greater service levels, greater leveraging of resources, etc.) that come with the elimination of duplicate efforts.
Standardized business practices across the enterprise ensure that all parts of the organization conform to practices that are consistent with corporate objectives. A Shared Service Center offers the following benefits:
- Establishes global processes and accessibility to data.
- Hastens incorporation of new business units.
- Establishes the right balance of centralized and decentralized functions.
- Standardizes and automates processes with self-service.
- Focuses on core competencies.
- Assures that management everywhere is reading from the same page.
- An important impact of the deployment of shared service centers is that the number of control points in a process and the number of variations of a process are greatly reduced, dramatically mitigating the risk of process error. The consolidation of data and processes in Shared Service Centers also mitigates against the risk of error and of poor decision making.
Implementing a Shared Services Center is different than centralizing operations. A Shared Service Center generally operates as a profit center providing a specified service (i.e. billing or expense reports) for a unit cost. A Shared Service Center might charge the entities it services a fee for every invoice that it processes. The fees to each internal organization are usually subject to the terms of a formal service-level agreement and are based on the volume of invoices or expense reports it processes. Centralizing operations, on the other hand, is usually associated with conglomeration of resources in a central location for the purposes of offering services upward to executive management. Centralized services typically operate as a cost center focused on providing centralized controls and decision making and approvals for the organization as opposed to sharing resources and processing for different entities across worldwide operations.
A Shared Service Center, by its nature, enforces internal controls on inappropriate processing. For example, in traditional local operations, an invoice of one operating unit (perhaps a company in a country) cannot be paid by a payment from a different company in a different country. This would amount to tax fraud. By contrast, in a Shared Service Center environment, processes that allow one company to perform services for others – with appropriate intercompany accounting – require that users access the data of different companies, each complying with different local requirements.
The Oracle E-Business Suite allows you to be both locally and corporately compliant while increasing efficiencies through Shared Service Centers. Consider an environment where the orders are taken in several different operating units (OUs), each representing different registered companies. These OUs segregate the orders and data appropriately. However, all of these orders can be managed from a "shared service" order desk through a single Responsibility in R12 of the E-Business Suite.
Core components of the E-Business Suite architecture that support Shared Services:
- Operating Units (OUs) provide a powerful security construct in the applications by creating a tight relationship between the functions a user can perform and the data that a user can process. This security model is appropriate in a business environment where local business units are solely responsible for managing all aspects of the finance and administration functions.
- Responsibilities can be associated with a single OU or with multiple OUs.
- Multiple Organizations Access Control expands the relationship between functions and data. You can isolate your data by OU for security and local level compliance and also enable certain users and processes to work across them. (new R12 feature)
- Subledger Accounting enables transactions to be entered in compliance with local and regulatory requirements and reported to meet corporate requirements. Each operating unit of a corporation can enter transactions in a local currency and according to their local chart of accounts, calendar, and accounting method. Release 12 maintains a real-time global view of the company based on the way each OU has set up its Secondary Ledger. (new R12 feature)
- Subledger Users are assigned responsibilities. A responsibility can be attached to one or more operating units as required, using Multiple Organizations Access Control. In a Shared Service Center, users are given access to OUs that are owned by the legal entities that the Center serves. For example, users at an Ireland Shared Service Center will be employed by an Ireland Legal Entity and have access to OUs that represent the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States. A shared service user with Multiple Organizations Access Control can select invoices stored in different operating units, combine them into one bank instruction, and send them to the bank for issuance.
- Ledger Sets are used to manage ledgers, including opening and closing of periods and running reports. Ledger sets support adjustments and allocations and specifically support adjusting ledgers. This separation of ledger data and ledger management is designed to support the creation of ledger shared service centers and moving ledgers into sets that are centrally managed. (new R12 feature)
- Legal Entities may share bank accounts over various operating units. Legal Entities may be governed by different tax jurisdictions.
- Customer and supplier bank accounts are now in the Trading Community and can be shared. (new R12 feature)
To learn more about Release 12’s Subledger Accounting, see this article.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Related Articles
- Globalized Financials in R12: Avoiding the Risk of Nuclear Disaster
- Everyone Takes the Hit: What You Can Do About It – 5 Key Business Metrics and Oracle E-Business Suite
- Getting the CFO to Pick Up His Bottom...Line: Best Practices in Cutting Costs
- The On-Ramp to Service-Oriented Architecture
- Adding Value by Subtracting: Maximizing Divestiture Gains
Enter your email address to sign up for our Newsletter
January Puzzle
A traveler gets lost on a deserted island and finds himself surrounded by a group of n cannibals.
Each cannibal wants to eat the traveler but, as each knows, there is a risk. A cannibal that attacks and eats the traveler would become tired and defenseless. After he eats, he would become an easy target for another cannibal (who would also become tired and defenseless after eating).
The cannibals are all hungry, but they cannot trust each other to cooperate. The cannibals happen to be well versed in game theory, so they will think before making a move.
Does the nearest cannibal, or any cannibal in the group, devour the lost traveler?
Solution
The short answer is the traveler’s fate depends on the parity of the group. If there is an odd number of canibals, the traveler will be eaten, but if there is an even number, the traveler will survive.
To prove this, we will consider small groups and use mathematical induction to explain the solution for larger groups.
Case n = 1: this is an obvious case. If there is one cannibal, the traveler will be eaten. It doesn’t matter that the cannibal will get tired because there are no other cannibals around as a threat.
Case n = 2: this is a more interesting case. Each cannibal wishes to each the traveler, but each knows he cannot. If either cannibal eats the traveler, then he will become defenseless and the other one will eat him. So each cannibal uses backwards induction to realize that the only strategy is to not eat the traveler. The hapless traveler finds a bit of luck, therefore, and actually survives.
Case n = 3: this is where the problem gets interesting. The best strategy is for the closest cannibal to make a move and eat the traveler. The cannibal will be defenseless after eating, but ultimately he will be safe. Why is that? The reasoning is due to induction: once the cannibal eats the traveler, the resulting situation has 2 unfed cannibals and the 1 defenseless cannibal. But as we just showed above, when there are 2 unfed cannibals, neither will make a move for fear of being eaten by the other! Thus the first cannibal to make a move will be safe as the remaining 2 cannibals block each other.
We can prove the higher cases using mathematical induction. If the number n is odd, then the closest cannibal can safely eat the traveler because the remaining number of unfed cannibals is even (and by induction, with an even number of unfed cannibals no one makes a move). If the number n is even, then no cannibal will eat the traveler, for if he did, the remaining number of cannibals would be odd, meaning he will get eaten by the induction hypothesis.
Success Tips for Oracle Project Management
- Create a standard for documentation at the beginning of your project, and hold team members accountable for completing documentation requirements as well as keeping them at and above the standards required.
- Before promulgating user documentation or training, it’s also a good idea to choose a representative from the among the business users base to review materials first.
- If you are not sure about the resources and budget required, obtain several estimates from people that have experience with the same size and scope of your project.
- Be explicit, before beginning the project, what internal resources are required for execution. This includes people, infrastructure, hardware, and software.
- Help the project champion understand the impact your project will have on the organization and how its successful completion will make him or her an internal hero or heroine for supporting it.
- Break up your project into smaller projects (try for projects that can be completed in 4-6 months, especially early on) to get success and demonstrate momentum.
- Make sure that your testing includes reports, upstream and downstream interfaces, customizations, enhancements, and workflows.
- Ensure that comprehensive transition reports and meetings between departing and incoming personnel are completed.
- Instead of spending time and resources implementing third-party reporting, consider consolidating multiple instances, moving to a global chart of accounts (CoA), and/or standardizing on a consistent calendar.
- Include governance, risk, and compliance management as part of the project plan.
- Finally, celebrate the successes. Too many projects focus on defects, failures, or small cost over-runs without looking at the big picture and what was accomplished.
The Analyst Corner
John Van Decker, Research VP of Gartner, states:
"A single chart of accounts allows consistency in financial reporting across the enterprise by standardizing on common metrics and reporting structures, reduces dependencies on a separate financial consolidation system, and significantly reduces the costs incurred with ongoing, complex conversions and translations."





