Agility by Design - eprentise Blog

Approaches for Changing the Chart of Accounts: Eliminating the Risks

PDFPrintE-mail

This paper is for decision makers who find the Chart of Accounts (COA) structure in Oracle E-Business Suite is holding back their business, understand there are inherent risks in changing the COA, and will nevertheless make the change if the risks can be eliminated.  The COA defines how accounting transactions, assets, and liabilities are processed and classified.  The COA is the framework for financial reporting and operational decision making.

The question is not whether the decision maker’s team can change the COA.  They can.  The prevalent available options include a commercial product and scripts written by consultants.  The decision is really a question of the risks and the results.

Without going into the technical details of the COA within the E-Business Suite, this paper asserts that at least one commercial product from an Oracle Partner can be used to change the COA with low risk, and that competing approaches based on custom in-house developers or consulting services have unacceptable risk, even if the costs appear lower.

Read more: Approaches for Changing the Chart of Accounts: Eliminating the Risks

 

Into the Future (And Back Again)

PDFPrintE-mail

Designing an accounting flexfield is one of the most difficult processes in an Oracle implementation. A “good” chart of accounts has the following criteria:

  1. The segments support important aspects of the business.
  2. You are able to report on critical business components with standard reports without resorting to spreadsheets.
  3. There is enough room to expand within each segment.
  4. FSGs and other reports are easy to create.
  5. Summary accounts and rollup groups fall naturally within ranges.

    Read more: Into the Future (And Back Again)

   

Flexfield Differences Between Releases 11i and 12

PDFPrintE-mail

Most of the changes to flexfields in Oracle Apps occurred between Version 10.7 and 11i. These changes included the addition of several APIs for the flexfields and the change of the name FlexBuilder to the Account Generator.

The most significant change is the ability in Release 12 to synchronize the context field value with the reference field value for descriptive flexfields. The example given in the documentation is that generating an expense report would refer to the context field for a country code and that would remain constant and specific to the user. If payment processing is done in another country, the context would not be derived from the payment processor’s country, but by the user who generated the original expense report. However, if the payment processor enters his/her own expense report, then the expense report would be synchronized to the country in which the payment processor resides. If the context field is not synchronized, the context information defaults at the time the record is created, even if the reference field value subsequently change.

The Release 12 documentation corrects an error from the Release 11 documentation in the key flexfield names. The Release 12 Flexfields Guide correctly refers to the code for the key flexfield for Sales Orders as MKTS and the Owning Application as Oracle Inventory and the code for the Sales Tax Location Flexfield as RLOC, and the owning application as Oracle Receivables. The other changes between Releases 11i and 12 are relatively minor. The documentation for Release 12 has been updated with some formatting changes, changes in referenced document names, and an update of some of the years from 2002 to 2007. Most noticeably, all references to prior versions and upgrades from prior versions have been omitted in the Release 12 documentation.

   

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Enter your email address to sign up for our Newsletter

Sign up now

captcha
TEChanges - Agility by Design

January Puzzle

A traveler gets lost on a deserted island and finds himself surrounded by a group of n cannibals.

Each cannibal wants to eat the traveler but, as each knows, there is a risk. A cannibal that attacks and eats the traveler would become tired and defenseless. After he eats, he would become an easy target for another cannibal (who would also become tired and defenseless after eating).

The cannibals are all hungry, but they cannot trust each other to cooperate. The cannibals happen to be well versed in game theory, so they will think before making a move.

Does the nearest cannibal, or any cannibal in the group, devour the lost traveler?

Show solution...

Solution

The short answer is the traveler’s fate depends on the parity of the group. If there is an odd number of canibals, the traveler will be eaten, but if there is an even number, the traveler will survive.

To prove this, we will consider small groups and use mathematical induction to explain the solution for larger groups.

Case n = 1: this is an obvious case. If there is one cannibal, the traveler will be eaten. It doesn’t matter that the cannibal will get tired because there are no other cannibals around as a threat.

Case n = 2: this is a more interesting case. Each cannibal wishes to each the traveler, but each knows he cannot. If either cannibal eats the traveler, then he will become defenseless and the other one will eat him. So each cannibal uses backwards induction to realize that the only strategy is to not eat the traveler. The hapless traveler finds a bit of luck, therefore, and actually survives.

Case n = 3: this is where the problem gets interesting. The best strategy is for the closest cannibal to make a move and eat the traveler. The cannibal will be defenseless after eating, but ultimately he will be safe. Why is that? The reasoning is due to induction: once the cannibal eats the traveler, the resulting situation has 2 unfed cannibals and the 1 defenseless cannibal. But as we just showed above, when there are 2 unfed cannibals, neither will make a move for fear of being eaten by the other! Thus the first cannibal to make a move will be safe as the remaining 2 cannibals block each other.

We can prove the higher cases using mathematical induction. If the number n is odd, then the closest cannibal can safely eat the traveler because the remaining number of unfed cannibals is even (and by induction, with an even number of unfed cannibals no one makes a move). If the number n is even, then no cannibal will eat the traveler, for if he did, the remaining number of cannibals would be odd, meaning he will get eaten by the induction hypothesis.

Success Tips for Oracle Project Management

  • Create a standard for documentation at the beginning of your project, and hold team members accountable for completing documentation requirements as well as keeping them at and above the standards required.
  • Before promulgating user documentation or training, it’s also a good idea to choose a representative from the among the business users base to review materials first.
  • If you are not sure about the resources and budget required, obtain several estimates from people that have experience with the same size and scope of your project.
  • Be explicit, before beginning the project, what internal resources are required for execution. This includes people, infrastructure, hardware, and software.
  • Help the project champion understand the impact your project will have on the organization and how its successful completion will make him or her an internal hero or heroine for supporting it.
  • Break up your project into smaller projects (try for projects that can be completed in 4-6 months, especially early on) to get success and demonstrate momentum.
  • Make sure that your testing includes reports, upstream and downstream interfaces, customizations, enhancements, and workflows.
  • Ensure that comprehensive transition reports and meetings between departing and incoming personnel are completed.
  • Instead of spending time and resources implementing third-party reporting, consider consolidating multiple instances, moving to a global chart of accounts (CoA), and/or standardizing on a consistent calendar.
  • Include governance, risk, and compliance management as part of the project plan.
  • Finally, celebrate the successes. Too many projects focus on defects, failures, or small cost over-runs without looking at the big picture and what was accomplished.

The Analyst Corner

John Van Decker, Research VP of Gartner, states:

"A single chart of accounts allows consistency in financial reporting across the enterprise by standardizing on common metrics and reporting structures, reduces dependencies on a separate financial consolidation system, and significantly reduces the costs incurred with ongoing, complex conversions and translations."